Not Just a Formality: Pay System Formalization and Sex-Related Earnings Effects
Marta M. Elvira () and
Mary E. Graham ()
Additional contact information
Marta M. Elvira: INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, Fontainebleau Cedex, 77305 France, and the Graduate School of Management, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3125
Mary E. Graham: School of Business, Clarkson University, P.O. Box 5790, Potsdam, New York 13699-5790
Organization Science, 2002, vol. 13, issue 6, 601-617
Abstract:
Drawing on neoclassical economic, internal labor market, and devaluation theories, we examine how the sex composition of jobs and the sex of individual workers affect earnings, depending upon the formalization of the pay type. Using personnel data for over 8,000 employees, we confirm the existence of a negative relationship between earnings and the proportion female in a job. We also find that for less-formalized pay types (cash incentive bonuses), sex-composition and individual-sex effects are larger than for more formalized pay (merit raises and base salary). Together, these findings support devaluation explanations, suggest that incentive bonuses may widen the earnings gap between women and men, and have implications for the design of pay structures in organizations.
Keywords: Sex Composition; Pay Formalization; Incentive Bonuses (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.601.499 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:601-617
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().