Managing Interdisciplinary, Longitudinal Research Teams: Extending Grounded Theory-Building Methodologies

Gina Colarelli O'Connor (), Mark P. Rice (), Lois Peters () and Robert W. Veryzer ()
Additional contact information
Gina Colarelli O'Connor: Lally School of Management and Technology, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590
Mark P. Rice: F. W. Olin Graduate School of Business, 242A Olin Hall, Babson College, Babson Park, Massachusetts 02457-0310
Lois Peters: Lally School of Management and Technology, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590
Robert W. Veryzer: Lally School of Management and Technology, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590

Organization Science, 2003, vol. 14, issue 4, 353-373

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to extend the literature on grounded theory development to incorporate considerations for team-based, interdisciplinary longitudinal research projects in the domain of organizational studies. Every element of the research process is affected if the research questions call for team-based data collection and interpretation over a lengthy period of time. It is unusual for a team of scholars from different disciplines to work together, not because the need doesn't exist, but because the mechanisms for doing so are not well established. We draw from the writings of scholars in the fields of research methodology, team and work-group design, and project management to inform our thinking on the subject. The work presented here is based on the authors' experiences during 1995–1999 as members of the Radical Innovation Research Program (RIRP). The RIRP is an ongoing multidisciplinary study of the development and management of radical innovations in established firms. Here, we do not describe the findings or insights associated with the content of the study, radical innovation, which is surely a complex managerial phenomenon. Rather, we focus on the processes used to conduct the research that were affected by the need for a multidisciplinary research team. A framework is presented for thinking about managing such a project. Challenges that we encountered within this framework are identified. Mechanisms we used (or, in some cases, wish we had used in retrospect) for confronting those challenges are also described. Throughout, we compare our study objectives and resultant methodological design choices with those of other multidisciplinary research teams that are by now well known in the organizational management literature. Our objective is to help researchers who are considering launching interdisciplinary, longitudinal studies of organizational processes as they plan and manage those pursuits.

Keywords: Longitudinal Research; Grounded Theory Methodology; Academic Teams (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.4.353.17485 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:353-373

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().