The Corporate Objective Revisited
Anant K. Sundaram () and
Andrew C. Inkpen ()
Additional contact information
Anant K. Sundaram: Thunderbird, The Garvin School of International Management, 15249 North 59th Avenue, Glendale, Arizona 85306
Andrew C. Inkpen: Thunderbird, The Garvin School of International Management, 15249 North 59th Avenue, Glendale, Arizona 85306, and Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798
Organization Science, 2004, vol. 15, issue 3, 350-363
Abstract:
The stock market convulsions and corporate scandals of 2001 and 2002 have reignited debate on the purposes of the corporation and, in particular, the goal of shareholder value maximization. We revisit the debate, re-examine the traditional rationales, and develop a set of new arguments for why the preferred objective function for the corporation must unambiguously continue to be the one that says “maximize shareholder value.” We trace the origins of the debates from the late nineteenth century, their implications for accepted law and practice of corporate governance in the United States, and their reflection in shareholder versus stakeholder views in the organization studies literature and contractarian versus communitarian views in the legal literature. We address in detail possible critiques of the shareholder value maximization view. Although we recognize certain boundary constraints to our arguments, we conclude that the issues raised by such critiques and constraints are not unique to the shareholder value maximization view, but will exist even if the firm is managed on behalf of nonshareowning stakeholders.
Keywords: shareholder value; stakeholder theory; corporate goal; corporate governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (120)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0068 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:15:y:2004:i:3:p:350-363
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().