Managing Multiple Roles: Work-Family Policies and Individuals’ Desires for Segmentation
Nancy P. Rothbard (),
Katherine W. Phillips () and
Tracy L. Dumas ()
Additional contact information
Nancy P. Rothbard: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Steinberg Hall-Dietrich Hall, Suite 2000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6370
Katherine W. Phillips: Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208-2001
Tracy L. Dumas: Columbian College of Arts and Sciences, George Washington University, 2147 F Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20052
Organization Science, 2005, vol. 16, issue 3, 243-258
Abstract:
As workers strive to manage multiple roles such as work and family, research has begun to focus on how people manage the boundary between work and nonwork roles. This paper contributes to emerging work on boundary theory by examining the extent to which individuals desire to integrate or segment their work and nonwork lives. This desire is conceptualized and measured on a continuum ranging from segmentation (i.e., separation) to integration (i.e., blurring) of work and nonwork roles. We examine the fit between individuals’ desires for integration/segmentation and their access to policies that enable boundary management, suggesting that more policies may not always be better in terms of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Using survey methodology and a sample of 460 employees, we found that desire for greater segmentation does moderate the relationship between the organizational policies one has access to and individuals’ satisfaction and commitment. People who want more segmentation are less satisfied and committed to the organization when they have greater access to integrating policies (e.g., onsite childcare) than when they have less access to such policies. Conversely, people who want greater segmentation are more committed when they have greater access to segmenting policies (e.g., flextime) than when they have less access to such policies. Moreover, the fit between desire for segmentation and organizational policy has an effect on satisfaction and commitment over and above the effects of demographic characteristics such as age, gender, marital status, income, number of children, and the ages of those children.
Keywords: work and family; integration; segmentation; person organization fit; job satisfaction; organizational commitment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0124 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:243-258
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().