A Future for Organization Theory: Living in and Living with Changing Organizations

James P. Walsh (), Alan D. Meyer () and Claudia Bird Schoonhoven ()
Additional contact information
James P. Walsh: Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1234
Alan D. Meyer: Charles H. Lundquist College of Business, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1208
Claudia Bird Schoonhoven: Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697

Organization Science, 2006, vol. 17, issue 5, 657-671

Abstract: We believe that the field of organization theory is adrift. In sailing jargon, we are “in irons”---stalled and making little headway toward understanding organizations and their place in our lives. We first attempt to diagnose our maladies and then, in this light, offer three broad research questions that just might reinvigorate our work: First, how can we understand today’s changing organizations? Second, how can we live in these organizations? And third, how can we best live with them? We close by calling attention to how our familiar approaches to building and testing theory might hamper any attempt to revitalize our field.

Keywords: organization theory; twenty-first century organizations; theory-building agenda (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0215 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:17:y:2006:i:5:p:657-671

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().