EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Perspective---Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s Past, Present, and Reconstructing for the Future

Giovanni Gavetti (), Daniel Levinthal () and William Ocasio ()
Additional contact information
Giovanni Gavetti: Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
Daniel Levinthal: Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 2000 Steinberg--Dietrich Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6370
William Ocasio: Kellogg School, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208

Organization Science, 2007, vol. 18, issue 3, 523-536

Abstract: Cyert and March’s (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm and the broader Carnegie School form critical theoretical underpinnings for modern organization studies. Despite its impact, however, we suggest that researchers who rely on the Carnegie School have progressively lost touch with its defining commitment to a decision-centered view of organizations. Decision making has given way to learning, routines, and an increased focus on change and adaptation; the organizational level of analysis, although frequently invoked, has been largely supplanted by either a more micro or a more macro focus. In this paper, we argue for restoring the School’s original mission and perspective. Our proposal for how this overarching goal can be achieved encompasses three central points. First, we believe the School needs to resurrect a few select ideas that, despite their fundamental importance, have been neglected over time. Second, we believe there is a need for greater paradigmatic closure amongst the School’s central theoretical pillars. Loose coupling among such pillars might keep key insights on organizational decision making from emerging. Finally, there is the need to incorporate major developments that have been generated post-Carnegie School, both within organization theory and in the behavioral and social sciences more broadly. In particular, we point to the shift to more open systems perspectives on organizations, the conceptions of organizations being embedded in larger social contexts, and recent developments in the study of individual cognition.

Keywords: Carnegie School; decision making; bounded rationality; loose coupling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (64)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0277 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:523-536

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-17
Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:523-536