Antecedents and Outcomes of Retaliation Against Whistleblowers: Gender Differences and Power Relationships

Michael T. Rehg (), Marcia P. Miceli (), Janet P. Near () and James R. Van Scotter ()
Additional contact information
Michael T. Rehg: Department of Systems and Engineering Management, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433
Marcia P. Miceli: McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057
Janet P. Near: Department of Management, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
James R. Van Scotter: Department of Information Systems and Decision Sciences, E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803

Organization Science, 2008, vol. 19, issue 2, 221-240

Abstract: Whistle-blowing represents an influence attempt in which organization member(s) try to persuade other members to cease wrongdoing; sometimes they fail; sometimes they succeed; sometimes they suffer reprisal. We investigated whether women experienced more retaliation than men, testing propositions derived from theories about gender differences and power variables, and using data from military and civilian employees of a large U.S. base. Being female was correlated with perceived retaliation. Results of structural equation modeling showed significant gender differences in antecedents and outcomes of retaliation. For men, lack of support from others and low whistleblower's power were significantly related to retaliation; for women, lack of support from others, serious wrongdoing, and the wrongdoing's direct effect on the whistleblower were significantly associated with retaliation. Retaliation in turn was negatively related to relationships with the supervisor for both men and women, and positively related to women's---but not men's---decisions to blow the whistle again, using external channels. We finish by discussing implications for theory and practice.

Keywords: retailation; whistle-blowing; gender; power relationships (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (50)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0310 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:221-240

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().