Moving Closer to the Action: Examining Compensation Design Effects on Firm Risk

Cynthia E. Devers (), Gerry McNamara (), Robert M. Wiseman () and Mathias Arrfelt ()
Additional contact information
Cynthia E. Devers: Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin--Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Gerry McNamara: Department of Management, Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
Robert M. Wiseman: Department of Management, Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
Mathias Arrfelt: School of Global Management and Leadership, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona 85069

Organization Science, 2008, vol. 19, issue 4, 548-566

Abstract: We examine the influence of CEO equity-based compensation on strategic risk taking by the firm. Building off the Behavioral Agency Model, Agency Theory, and Prospect Theory, we develop arguments about when equity-based compensation elements will increase or decrease executive risk propensity and, in turn, strategic risk taking. Incorporating a behavioral perspective into our models of incentive alignment provides us with new and potentially more accurate predictions about how individual elements of CEO pay will influence risk selection, as well as how equity compensation interacts with cash compensation and with other factors to influence risk preferences. In general, this study provides evidence that CEO equity-based compensation significantly influences strategic risk, but that this influence is more nuanced and complex than conventional treatments of executive compensation assume. In particular, we find that different forms of equity-based pay exhibit dissimilar influences on strategic risk and that their influence changes as their value and vesting status change. Second, we find that cash-based forms of pay moderate the incentive properties of equity-based pay, indicating that cash-based pay may affect how executives perceive risks associated with equity pay. Finally, we find that stock price volatility and board actions each also moderate the incentive effects of equity-based pay. In sum, our results argue for increased recognition of a behavioral perspective on executive compensation and greater precision in how we measure and model the incentive alignment properties of CEO compensation.

Keywords: incentive alignment; CEO compensation; corporate governance; strategic risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (88)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0317 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:19:y:2008:i:4:p:548-566

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().