Fostering Team Innovation: Why Is It Important to Combine Opposing Action Strategies?

Diether Gebert (), Sabine Boerner () and Eric Kearney ()
Additional contact information
Diether Gebert: Department of Management, Korea University Business School, Anam-dong Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 136-701, Republic of Korea
Sabine Boerner: Universität Konstanz, Lehrstuhl für Management, insb. Strategie und Führung, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
Eric Kearney: Jacobs University Bremen, Jacobs Center on Lifelong Learning and Institutional Development, 28725 Bremen, Germany

Organization Science, 2010, vol. 21, issue 3, 593-608

Abstract: We develop a framework that provides a general theoretical rationale for the claim made by several authors that combining opposing action strategies fosters team innovation. We distinguish between open and closed strategies and posit that these are opposing but complementary in that each fosters one of two processes necessary for team innovation: open action strategies (e.g., delegative leadership) promote knowledge generation, and closed action strategies (e.g., directive leadership) enhance knowledge integration. We argue that each pole of a pair of opposing action strategies both energizes and detracts from elements of innovation. Thus, it could be expected that combining opposing action strategies leads to an impasse, as the negative effects of each strategy might offset the positive effects of the opposite strategy. There is currently no viable explanation in the literature for why this mutual neutralization may not occur. We aim to fill this gap by explicating why and how opposing action strategies, when implemented simultaneously, do not countervail each other's positive effects, but rather yield positive synergies that fuel team innovation.

Keywords: opposing action strategies; team innovation; paradox; equilibrium of forces (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0485 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:21:y:2010:i:3:p:593-608

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().