Knowing Where You Stand: Physical Isolation, Perceived Respect, and Organizational Identification Among Virtual Employees
Caroline A. Bartel (),
Amy Wrzesniewski () and
Batia M. Wiesenfeld ()
Additional contact information
Caroline A. Bartel: McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
Amy Wrzesniewski: Yale School of Management, New Haven, Connecticut 06511
Batia M. Wiesenfeld: Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012
Organization Science, 2012, vol. 23, issue 3, 743-757
Abstract:
This research investigates the relationship between virtual employees' degree of physical isolation and their perceived respect in the organization. Respect is an identity-based status perception that reflects the extent to which one is included and valued as a member of the organization. We hypothesize that the degree of physical isolation is negatively associated with virtual employees' perceived respect and that this relationship explains the lower organizational identification among more physically isolated virtual employees. In two field studies using survey methods, we find that perceived respect is negatively associated with the degree of physical isolation, and respect mediates the relationship between physical isolation and organizational identification. These effects hold for shorter- and longer-tenured employees alike. Our research contributes to the virtual work literature by drawing attention to physical isolation and the important but neglected role of status perceptions in shaping virtual employees' organizational identification. We also contribute to the literature on perceived respect by demonstrating how respect is affected by the physical context of work.
Keywords: organizational identification; virtual work; telecommuting; respect; social status; isolation; physical context of work (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0661 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:743-757
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().