Double Victimization in the Workplace: Why Observers Condemn Passive Victims of Sexual Harassment

Kristina A. Diekmann (), Sheli D. Sillito Walker (), Adam D. Galinsky () and Ann E. Tenbrunsel ()
Additional contact information
Kristina A. Diekmann: David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Sheli D. Sillito Walker: Marriott School of Management, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
Adam D. Galinsky: Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Ann E. Tenbrunsel: Mendoza School of Business, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556

Organization Science, 2013, vol. 24, issue 2, 614-628

Abstract: Five studies explore observers' condemnation of passive victims. Studies 1 and 2 examine the role of observers' behavioral forecasts in condemning passive victims of sexual harassment. Observers generally predicted that they would engage in greater confrontation than victims typically do. More importantly, the more confrontation participants predicted they would engage in, the more they condemned the passive victim, and the less willing they were to recommend the victim for a job and to work with her. Study 3 identifies the failure to consider important motivations likely experienced by victims—and that contribute to their passivity—as an important driver of behavioral forecasting errors. Having forecasters reflect on motivations normally experienced but not typically forecast produced behavioral predictions that were more consistent with the actual passive behavior of sexual harassment victims. Studies 4 and 5 reduce condemnation of passive sexual harassment victims by highlighting important motivations likely experienced by those victims (Study 4) and by having participants recall a past experience of not acting when being intimidated in the workplace, a situation related but distinct from sexual harassment (Study 5). The results from these studies add insights into the causes and consequences of victim condemnation and help explain why passivity in the face of harassment—the predominant response—is subject to so much scorn.

Keywords: interpersonal condemnation; sexual harassment; forecasting; construal; social distancing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0753 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:614-628

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().