EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Double-Edged Nature of Board Gender Diversity: Diversity, Firm Performance, and the Power of Women Directors as Predictors of Strategic Change

María del Carmen Triana (), Toyah L. Miller () and Tiffany M. Trzebiatowski ()
Additional contact information
María del Carmen Triana: Department of Management and Human Resources, Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Toyah L. Miller: Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
Tiffany M. Trzebiatowski: Department of Management and Human Resources, Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Organization Science, 2014, vol. 25, issue 2, 609-632

Abstract: Diverse boards have been seen as providing impetus for initiating change. However, diversity may introduce conflict and impede decision making, which could hinder the ability of the firm to make strategic change, especially in times when firm performance is low. Integrating threat-rigidity theory and team diversity research, we examine how board gender diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors interact to influence the amount of strategic change. Results support a three-way interaction, indicating that when the board is not experiencing a threat as a result of low firm performance and women directors have greater power, the relationship between board gender diversity and amount of strategic change is the most positive. However, when the board is threatened by low firm performance and women directors have greater power, the relationship between board gender diversity and amount of strategic change is the most negative. Results suggest that diversity is double-edged because it can propel or impede strategic change depending on firm performance and the power of women directors.

Keywords: diversity; boards; board of directors; gender diversity; power; governance; strategic change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (53)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0842 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:609-632

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:609-632