Overcoming Stickiness: How the Timing of Knowledge Transfer Methods Affects Transfer Difficulty

Gabriel Szulanski (), Dimo Ringov () and Robert J. Jensen ()
Additional contact information
Gabriel Szulanski: Strategy Department, INSEAD, Singapore 138676
Dimo Ringov: Department of Strategy and General Management, ESADE Business School, Ramon Llull University, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Robert J. Jensen: Department of Organizational Leadership and Strategy, Marriott School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602

Organization Science, 2016, vol. 27, issue 2, 304-322

Abstract: Knowledge transfer can be facilitated through the judicious timing of transfer methods. Yet, extant research has neglected the impact of the timing of transfer methods. Departing from this observation, we theorize the existence of two knowledge transfer modes—“front-loading” and “back-loading”—based on whether the affordance for tacit knowledge exchange provided by the transfer methods used is higher during the initiation or during the implementation phase of a transfer. We suggest that the impact of front-loading and back-loading on transfer difficulty is contingent on the causal ambiguity of the knowledge being transferred and on the arduousness of the relationship between the source and the recipient of knowledge. We operationalize front-loading and back-loading and test our propositions using primary data on 2,711 instances of method use in 116 transfers of 37 organizational practices in 8 companies. We hypothesize and find empirical support for the claim that front-loading affordance for tacit knowledge exchange reduces transfer difficulty when the causal ambiguity of the knowledge to be transferred is high, whereas it increases difficulty when the relationship between the source and recipient of knowledge is arduous.

Keywords: knowledge transfer; knowledge transfer methods; knowledge transfer process; tacit knowledge; stickiness; organizational learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1049 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:304-322

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().