It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives

Elad N. Sherf (), Subrahmaniam Tangirala () and Katy Connealy Weber ()
Additional contact information
Elad N. Sherf: Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012
Subrahmaniam Tangirala: Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Katy Connealy Weber: CEB, Arlington, Virginia 22209

Organization Science, 2017, vol. 28, issue 2, 193-210

Abstract: Attempts to improve gender parity at workplaces are more effective when organizations mobilize their entire workforce, including men, to participate (i.e., speak up with ideas, volunteer, or serve as champions) in gender-parity initiatives. Yet, frequently, men are hesitant to participate in such initiatives. We explicate one reason for such hesitation on the part of men and suggest ways organizations can address this challenge. Using four studies (correlational as well as experimental), we demonstrate that men experience lower psychological standing (i.e., a subjective judgment of legitimacy to perform an action) with respect to gender-parity initiatives that leads them to participate less in such initiatives. We explain how psychological standing provides a complementary explanation to the current narrative in the literature suggesting that men’s poor participation results from sexist or discriminatory attitudes toward gender parity. We also establish that psychological standing influences participation over and above efficacy, instrumentality, and psychological safety and highlight how organizations can increase men’s participation by providing them with psychological standing when soliciting their participation in gender-parity initiatives. We discuss the implications of our findings for the literatures on gender parity, change management, and employee voice and participation.

Keywords: job status; status leakage; gender; spillover; crossover; marital instability; work and family (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1118 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:28:y:2017:i:2:p:193-210

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().