Cognition, Technology, and Organizational Limits: Lessons from the Air France 447 Disaster

Nick Oliver (), Thomas Calvard () and Kristina Potočnik ()
Additional contact information
Nick Oliver: University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh EH8 9JS, United Kingdom
Thomas Calvard: University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh EH8 9JS, United Kingdom
Kristina Potočnik: University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh EH8 9JS, United Kingdom

Organization Science, 2017, vol. 28, issue 4, 729-743

Abstract: Organizations, particularly those for whom safety and reliability are crucial, develop routines to protect them from failure. But even highly reliable organizations are not immune to disaster and prolonged periods of safe operation are punctuated by occasional catastrophes. Scholars of safety science label this the “paradox of almost totally safe systems,” noting that systems that are very safe under normal conditions may be vulnerable under unusual ones. In this paper, we explain, develop, and apply the concept of “organizational limits” to this puzzle through an analysis of the loss of Air France 447. We show that an initial, relatively minor limit violation set in train a cascade of human and technological limit violations, with catastrophic consequences. Focusing on cockpit automation, we argue that the same measures that make a system safe and predictable may introduce restrictions on cognition, which over time, inhibit or erode the disturbance-handling capability of the actors involved. We also note limits to cognition in system design processes that make it difficult to foresee complex interactions. We discuss the implications of our findings for predictability and control in contexts beyond aviation and ways in which these problems might be addressed.

Keywords: managerial and organizational cognition; interpretation and sense making; decision making; complex systems analysis; ambidextrous organizations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1138 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:28:y:2017:i:4:p:729-743

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().