 Made in Academia: The Effect of Institutional Origin on Inventors’ Attention to ScienceMichaël Bikard ()
Organization Science, 2018, vol. 29, issue 5, 818-836 Abstract: Inventors cannot exploit new scientific discoveries if they do not pay attention to them. However, allocating attention to science is difficult because the scientific literature is complex, vast, fast-changing, and often unreliable. Inventors are therefore likely to rely on informational cues when screening new publications. I posit that inventors pay significantly less attention to discoveries “made in academia” than to those “made in industry” because they believe that the work of academic scientists will be less useful to them. I test this proposition by examining inventors’ patent references to the scientific literature in the case of simultaneous discoveries made by at least one team based in academia and another based in industry. I find that inventors are 23% less likely to cite the academic paper than its “twin” from industry. My results highlight the importance of inventors’ attention as a previously underexplored bottleneck shaping the translation of science into new technologies. Keywords: innovation; attention; academic science; simultaneous discoveries; patents; use of science in inventions (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:29:y:2018:i:5:p:818-836 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.