Co-Opt or Coexist? A Study of Medical Cannabis Dispensaries’ Identity-Based Responses to Recreational-Use Legalization in Colorado and Washington

Greta Hsu (), Özgecan Koçak () and Balázs Kovács ()
Additional contact information
Greta Hsu: Graduate School of Management, University of California–Davis, Davis, California 95616
Özgecan Koçak: Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Balázs Kovács: School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520

Organization Science, 2018, vol. 29, issue 1, 172-190

Abstract: When recreational cannabis dispensaries first entered the U.S. market in 2014, how did incumbent medical cannabis dispensaries react? Did they emphasize their distinct identity as medical providers, distancing themselves from recreational dispensaries and those consumers who consume cannabis recreationally? Or did they downplay their medical orientation to compete directly for potential resources? In this study, we propose that how incumbent organizations position their identities in response to increasing competition from an emerging rival form depends on key audiences’ acceptance of the new form. Using data on the evolving cannabis markets in the states of Colorado and Washington during the year following the initial emergence of the recreational category, we find a sharpening of identity among medical dispensaries in communities with low voter support for recreational-use legalization. Medical dispensaries accentuated the medical orientation of their identities as recreational dispensaries increasingly set up operations and as buyers inclined more toward recreational use. In contrast, we find a blurring of medical/recreational identity in communities where voters demonstrated support for recreational-use legalization in the state-level ballot. Overall, the theoretical framework we advance integrates cultural and strategic approaches by explicitly considering conflict in different audiences’ beliefs about the legitimacy of products and its implications for market producers seeking to connect with and appeal to current/potential consumers.

Keywords: organizational ecology; sociology of markets; institutional theory; field theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1167 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:29:y:2019:i:1:p:172-190

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().