When Developers Disagree: Divergent Advice as a Potential Catalyst for Protégé Growth

Elana Feldman () and William Kahn ()
Additional contact information
Elana Feldman: Manning School of Business, University of Massachusetts–Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854
William Kahn: Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

Organization Science, 2019, vol. 30, issue 3, 509-527

Abstract: Developmental relationships offer rich opportunities for personal growth, which enables people to operate effectively in complex work environments. Although it is now widely recognized that protégés typically have more than one developmental relationship simultaneously, few researchers have considered the ways in which developmental networks—comprising a protégé’s multiple developers—foster growth. We therefore know little about how protégés grow through their engagement in several concurrent relationships. In this paper, we suggest that understanding growth in the context of developmental networks requires viewing such networks as intertwined assemblages of dyadic relationships. Adopting this perspective, we theorize one way in which the interactions that protégés have across their various relationships may—cumulatively—catalyze growth. In our theorizing, we focus on a specific type of situation: instances when developers offer divergent advice about work-related issues. Our model traces how protégés cope with divergent advice through either an engaged grappling process or an avoidant retreating process . We theorize that whereas grappling activities yield high levels of growth, retreating activities produce no growth. However, we also suggest that protégés may oscillate back and forth between the grappling and retreating processes over time, thereby resulting in varying rather than binary growth outcomes. Our paper contributes to scholarship on developmental relationships and networks while also laying the groundwork for future empirical research.

Keywords: developmental networks; developmental relationships; workplace relationships; personal growth; emotions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1256 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:30:y:2019:i:3:p:509-527

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().