One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: How Negative External Evaluations Can Shorten Organizational Time Horizons

Mark DesJardine () and Pratima Bansal ()
Additional contact information
Mark DesJardine: HEC Paris, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France; The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Pratima Bansal: Ivey Business School, Western University, London, Ontario N6G 0N1, Canada

Organization Science, 2019, vol. 30, issue 4, 761-780

Abstract: Researchers have endeavored to explain the causes of short organizational time horizons because of the organizational and societal costs of corporate short-termism. These explanations, however, tend to confound cognitive with behavioral explanations, which masks the importance of cognitive biases. We address this oversight by situating our work in prospect theory and organizational search, which underscores the importance of external evaluations on organizational time horizons and the asymmetry of positive and negative evaluations. Specifically, we argue that negative evaluations will shorten organizational time horizons more than positive evaluations will lengthen them. In our research context of financial analysts, this means that “sell” recommendations will shorten time horizons more than “buy” recommendations will lengthen them. Our main thesis can help to explain rising short-termism among some publicly traded companies. We operationalize organizational time horizons by the language managers use during 3,136 quarterly earnings conference calls. We test our main hypothesis and other timing-related moderating effects on 98 extractives firms from 2006 to 2013.

Keywords: organizational time horizon; short-termism; organizational search; external evaluations; security analysts; textual analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1259 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:761-780

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().