Why Do Firms Suffer Differently from Input Stigmatization? The Costs of Removing Stigmatized Inputs

Luis Diestre () and Juan Santalo
Additional contact information
Luis Diestre: IE Business School, Madrid 28006, Spain

Organization Science, 2020, vol. 31, issue 1, 47–66

Abstract: Firms using stigmatized inputs are likely to experience strong pressures from multiple stakeholders who demand removal of such inputs from firm operations. Consistent with this phenomenon, we propose that greater levels of input stigma decrease firm performance and that firms respond to this threat by reducing the use of such inputs. However, we argue that not all firms are equally able to remove stigmatized inputs. Firms with a high degree of input overlap among their product units will be less likely to remove stigmatized inputs from their operations; as such, a change could be costlier for them. Consequently, we propose that firms facing high input overlap will experience the negative effects of input stigma more strongly. We find support for our theory by looking at toxic chemicals as the inputs that may become stigmatized.

Keywords: input stigma; stakeholder pressures; corporate diversification; organizational rigidities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1293 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:47-66

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().