Organizing Entrepreneurial Teams: A Field Experiment on Autonomy over Choosing Teams and Ideas

Viktoria Boss (), Linus Dahlander (), Christoph Ihl () and Rajshri Jayaraman ()
Additional contact information
Viktoria Boss: Institute of Entrepreneurship, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany
Linus Dahlander: ESMT Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany
Christoph Ihl: Institute of Entrepreneurship, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany
Rajshri Jayaraman: ESMT Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3K7, Canada

Organization Science, 2023, vol. 34, issue 6, 2097-2118

Abstract: Scholars have suggested that autonomy can lead to better entrepreneurial team performance. Yet, there are different types of autonomy, and they come at a cost. We shed light on whether two fundamental organizational design choices—granting teams autonomy to (1) choose project ideas to work on and (2) choose team members to work with—affect performance. We run a field experiment involving 939 students in a lean startup entrepreneurship course over 11 weeks. The aim is to disentangle the separate and joint effects of granting autonomy over choosing teams and choosing ideas compared with a baseline treatment with preassigned ideas and team members. We find that teams with autonomy over choosing either ideas or team members outperform teams in the baseline treatment as measured by pitch deck performance. The effect of choosing ideas is significantly stronger than the effect of choosing teams . However, the performance gains vanish for teams that are granted full autonomy over choosing both ideas and teams. This suggests the two forms of autonomy are substitutes. Causal mediation analysis reveals that the main effects of choosing ideas or teams can be partly explained by a better match of ideas with team members’ interests and prior network contacts among team members, respectively. Although homophily and lack of team diversity cannot explain the performance drop among teams with full autonomy, our results suggest that self-selected teams fall prey to overconfidence and complacency too early to fully exploit the potential of their chosen idea. We discuss the implications of these findings for research on organizational design, autonomy, and innovation.

Keywords: autonomy; teams; ideas; entrepreneurial performance; field experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1520 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:6:p:2097-2118

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().