A Temporal Perspective on Boundary Spanning: Engagement Dynamics and Implications for Knowledge Transfer

Ann-Kristin Zobel (), Lukas Falcke () and Stephen D. Comello ()
Additional contact information
Ann-Kristin Zobel: Institute of Management and Strategy, University of St. Gallen, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland
Lukas Falcke: KIN Center for Digital Innovation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
Stephen D. Comello: Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, California 94305

Organization Science, 2024, vol. 35, issue 2, 474-495

Abstract: This study adopts a temporal perspective to investigate how boundary spanners can increase the inflow of external knowledge by engaging with both external and internal parties. We add to prior work on knowledge transfer by shifting the focus from engagement levels to investigating engagement dynamics, especially the degree of switching between external and internal engagement across consecutive time periods. Drawing from a cognitive perspective, we argue that switching strongly between engagement types is associated with a segmented knowledge structure that enables quick and efficient categorical processing when knowledge can simply be “channeled” from source to recipient units. In contrast, weak or no switching is associated with a blended knowledge structure and more reflective processing, which is particularly helpful when knowledge transfer requires more translation and transformation. Correspondingly, we adopt a contingency perspective and theorize that the cognitive advantages associated with stronger versus weaker switching weigh differently, contingent on the stickiness of knowledge to be transferred and the nature of boundary-spanning activities that vary in importance over time. Fixed effects models of eight waves of original survey data reveal that, in line with our theorizing, the association between switching and knowledge transfer becomes increasingly negative (1) the more boundary spanners access knowledge that is transspecialist in nature, (2) the greater the organizational distance between source and recipient units, and (3) in later phases of the boundary-spanning process.

Keywords: boundary spanning; knowledge transfer; engagement dynamics; collaborative innovation; longitudinal surveys (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1677 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:2:p:474-495

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().