Keep Off My Turf! Low-Status Managers’ Territoriality as a Response to Employees’ Novel Ideas

Vijaya Venkataramani (), Rellie Derfler-Rozin (), Xin Liu () and Jih-Yu Mao ()
Additional contact information
Vijaya Venkataramani: Management & Organizations Department, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Rellie Derfler-Rozin: Management & Organizations Department, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Xin Liu: Department of Organization and Human Resources, Renmin Business School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
Jih-Yu Mao: Department of International Business and Management, Nottingham University Business School China, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China

Organization Science, 2024, vol. 35, issue 4, 1224-1250

Abstract: Although employees come up with creative (i.e., novel and useful) ideas, many of those ideas are not endorsed or implemented by managers. In shedding light on this phenomenon, we propose that managers who have lower social status in the organization are more likely to reject employees’ novel (but still useful) ideas. Guided by associative-propositional evaluation theory (AP-E) and the literature on the psychology of having low status, we hypothesize that when employees propose novel (compared with more mundane) ideas, it triggers greater feelings of insecurity and threat in low-status (versus high-status) managers, who perceive that these employees, if successful, could potentially infringe on their own domains at work. In turn, such low-status managers feel the need to be territorial—that is, to maintain and protect their existing work domains from potential infringement by others—and therefore refrain from endorsing their employees’ novel, yet useful ideas. However, we suggest that such negative effects are attenuated when low-status managers have high levels of organizational identification, allowing them to subordinate their self-interest to the interests of the broader organization. We demonstrate these effects in four preregistered studies—three laboratory experiments and a field study (with real employee ideas provided to managers for their assessment). We discuss the implications for the literature on the receiving side of creativity, territoriality, and status in organizations.

Keywords: creativity endorsement; status; territoriality; innovation; identification; multimethod approach (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15132 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1224-1250

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().