Board Gender Diversity Reforms Around the World: The Impact on Corporate Innovation

Kun Tracy Wang (), Lin Cui (), Nathan Zhenghang Zhu () and Aonan Sun ()
Additional contact information
Kun Tracy Wang: Research School of Accounting, College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
Lin Cui: Research School of Management, College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
Nathan Zhenghang Zhu: School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, People’s Republic of China
Aonan Sun: Business School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia

Organization Science, 2025, vol. 36, issue 4, 1416-1437

Abstract: In response to persistent gender inequality in corporate leadership, many countries have implemented board gender diversity reforms, either through legislation or by revising governance codes for board appointments. Whereas these reforms aim to enhance women’s representation and influence in leadership roles, their effects on corporate outcomes, such as innovation, remain unclear. This study develops a two-mechanism institutional contingency model to investigate how board gender diversity reforms affect firm innovation through representation and empowerment mechanisms. Using a unique hand-collected data set on worldwide board gender diversity reforms and a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design, we find that these reforms significantly improve innovation outcomes, with the empowerment mechanism having a stronger positive effect than the representation mechanism. Additionally, we show that rule-based reforms, although they are effective at increasing female board representation, often lead to symbolic compliance and tokenism, which limits their ability to enhance innovation. In contrast, comply-or-explain reforms, which emphasize empowerment and genuine engagement, yield more meaningful progress in firm innovation. Our findings also reveal that countries with higher prereform gender disparities and a larger pool of qualified female directors experience greater innovation gains following the implementation of these reforms. By distinguishing between the effects of representation and empowerment, this study provides a nuanced understanding of how gender diversity regulations can serve as catalysts for innovation and offers valuable insights for policymakers designing reforms to promote gender equality and economic outcomes.

Keywords: board gender diversity reform; gender inequality; female representation; female empowerment; innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16956 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:36:y:2025:i:4:p:1416-1437

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().