Passion Penalizes Women and Advantages (Unexceptional) Men in High-Potential Designations

Joyce C. He (), Jon M. Jachimowicz () and Celia Moore ()
Additional contact information
Joyce C. He: Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095
Jon M. Jachimowicz: Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
Celia Moore: Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

Organization Science, 2025, vol. 36, issue 4, 1438-1465

Abstract: High-potential programs offer a swift path up the corporate ladder for those who secure a place on them. However, the evaluation of “potential” occurs under considerable uncertainty, creating fertile ground for gender bias. We document that men are more likely than women to be designated as high potential, and unpack how gendered responses to employees’ expressions of passion—one of the most commonly used criteria used in evaluating potential—both penalize women and advantage men in high-potential selection processes. First, and based on prior research on gender display rules, we suggest that expressions of passion are viewed as a less appropriate emotional display for women than men, giving rise to a female penalty. Second, and drawing on shifting standards theorizing, we posit that expressions of passion shift evaluators’ predictions of candidates’ diligence more meaningfully for men than women, creating a male advantage—particularly for men who are reasonably high but not exceptional performers. We provide supporting evidence across two studies examining placement into high-potential programs in a real talent review setting ( N = 796) and a preregistered experiment that uses videos featuring trained actors ( N = 1,366), supported by two supplementary studies ( N = 1,590). Taken together, this work sheds light on the ways the increasing emphasis on passion in contemporary workplaces may exacerbate gender inequalities. Progressing our understanding of gender bias beyond gendered reactions to criteria that penalize women (i.e., backlash), our work also unveils a novel and particularly pernicious form of gender bias driven by gendered inferences about passion that advantage men.

Keywords: gender bias; shifting standards; passion; diligence; talent management; high potential (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.18018 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:36:y:2025:i:4:p:1438-1465

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().