Explaining the Whistle-Blowing Process: Suggestions from Power Theory and Justice Theory

Janet P. Near, Terry Morehead Dworkin and Marcia P. Miceli
Additional contact information
Janet P. Near: Department of Management, School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-1701
Terry Morehead Dworkin: Department of Business Law, School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-1701
Marcia P. Miceli: Department of Management and Human Resources, College of Business Administration, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1399

Organization Science, 1993, vol. 4, issue 3, 393-411

Abstract: Review of research concerning whistle-blowing suggests that legal sanctions have been singularly unsuccessful in encouraging whistle-blowing but that legalistic responses by organizations seem to have been somewhat more successful. Below, we review three sets of studies that illustrate this point. The first set includes federal employees, both before and after a legal change intended to encourage whistle-blowing. The second study examines the effects of state laws, by comparing states with whistle-blowing statutes to those without such statutes. The third study focuses on whistle-blowers who are role prescribed and therefore have legalistic protections but not legal protections. Results from these three sets of studies suggest that legal procedures seem not to be effective in encouraging positive organizational responses to whistle-blowing, but legalistic responses designed by the organizations themselves have more positive effects both for the whistle-blowers and for the organizations themselves. We attempt to resolve this apparent paradox by considering two theoretical frameworks, power relations and justice theory, and using these frameworks to predict the behaviors of both whistle-blowers and their organizations when legal mechanisms are involved and when legalistic mechanisms are used. Finally, drawing on the implications of our theoretical analysis, we provide policy suggestions for the encouragement of legalistic mechanisms, in addition to legal mechanisms, to persuade organizations to respond positively to whistle-blowers.

Keywords: whistle-blowing; justice theory; resource dependence theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.3.393 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:4:y:1993:i:3:p:393-411

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().