Inertial Forces and the Implementation of a Socio-Technical Systems Approach: A Communication Study

Gail T. Fairhurst, Stephen Green and John Courtright
Additional contact information
Gail T. Fairhurst: Department of Communication, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0184
Stephen Green: The Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
John Courtright: Department of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716

Organization Science, 1995, vol. 6, issue 2, 168-185

Abstract: Borrowing from population ecology, this study examined the potential effects of organizational inertia on the implementation of a socio-technical systems (STS) philosophy in five manufacturing plants. Plant history (conversion from a hierarchical system as opposed to STS from start-up) and plant manager style (autocratic as opposed to participative) were posed as potential sources of inertia. As counterproductive inertial forces, a conversion plant history and an autocratic plant manager style were hypothesized to be associated with less participative communication between lower level managers and subordinates in the plants. Using a coding scheme to analyze and compare actual work interactions, we found that when both inertial forces were present, participation between manager and subordinates as equals was less (i.e., there were fewer challenges by subordinates of managers’ statements, more manager led discussion, and more subordinate approval seeking). When these inertial forces were absent, subordinates assumed a more assertive, equal role in communication. Subordinates challenged manager assertions, more often led discussion that was copied by the manager, and experienced fewer control attempts by the manager in discussions led by the subordinate. The implications of these findings for advancing our understanding of population ecology dynamics within the firm are discussed. Links between population ecology, communication patterns, and organizational change are also addressed.

Keywords: socio-technical systems; population ecology; inertia; management style; dyad communication; organization change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.168 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:6:y:1995:i:2:p:168-185

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().