EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Feeling Stressed and Burned Out: A Feminist Reading and Re-Visioning of Stress-based Emotions Within Medicine and Organization Science

Debra E. Meyerson
Additional contact information
Debra E. Meyerson: Simmons Institute of Leadership and Change, Stanford Institute for Research on Women and Gender, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

Organization Science, 1998, vol. 9, issue 1, 103-118

Abstract: This article is written in the spirit of resistance, as a challenge and alternative to what are accepted as neutral, unbiased conceptualizations of stress and burnout within traditional and popular discourse. Findings reported in a previous study suggest that the ways we conceptualize and experience stress and burnout are not inherently neutral, but are shaped by culture and a particular set of dominant themes prevalent in organizational and professional discourse. This article exposes the processes by which some forms of organizational experience and knowledge related to stress and burnout have become dominant, whereas “other” forms have become marginal and suppressed. Through a postmodern feminist reading of stress and burnout as expressed within the medical and organizational discourses, the author reveals how gender acts as an axis of power and meaning that helps sustain dominant and seemingly neutral conceptualizations within the discourses. Building from the feminist reading, she develops a radical reconstruction of the ways organizational participants and theorists could interpret and experience stress related emotions, and discusses the cultural conditions that could produce and sustain such a revision. The reading and revision reveal ways in which experiences of stress and burnout have been shaped and constrained by the dominant discourse and suggest ways social scientists might rewrite those experiences toward more humane ends. Insofar as stress and burnout are among the most common and well-researched topics (and emotions) within the field of organizational behavior, this paper has far-reaching theoretical, epistemological, and practical implications. More generally, the feminist reading and revision open new spaces for other ways of theorizing and argues against the limitations of knowledge and experience imposed by traditional organizational theory and medical discourse.

Keywords: Feminist Organization Theory; Feminist Reconstruction; Stress and Gender; Emotions and Gender; Medicine and Feminist Theory; Feminist Organization Theory; Feminist Epistemology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.1.103 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:9:y:1998:i:1:p:103-118

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:9:y:1998:i:1:p:103-118