Latecomer Strategies: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea
Dong-Sung Cho,
Dong-Jae Kim and
Dong Kee Rhee
Additional contact information
Dong-Sung Cho: College of Business Administration, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
Dong-Jae Kim: Graduate School of International Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea
Dong Kee Rhee: College of Business Administration, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
Organization Science, 1998, vol. 9, issue 4, 489-505
Abstract:
The effects of strategic order of entry on firms' performance have long been an issue in many areas of study. Past research efforts, however, have been concentrated mostly on first mover or early entrant advantages. To contribute to developing a theory of latecomer strategies, the authors investigate how latecomers compete successfully or even leapfrog early movers. They review previous studies on early mover advantages and disadvantages, and group the sources of such advantages or disadvantages into three areas: the firm, its market, and its competitors. The theoretical focus is how a firm converts the opportunities stemming from entry order into performance. The authors seek to confirm and extend relevant theories by examining how late entrants have caught up with incumbent industry leaders in the global semiconductor industry. On the basis of in-depth case analysis of three Japanese and three Korean semiconductor companies, they identify and categorize successful latecomer strategies into two types: strategies for overcoming latecomer disadvantages and strategies for utilizing latecomer advantages. Focusing, thin margin or loss bearing, and volume building form the essence of strategies for overcoming disadvantages, whereas odd timing, time compression, human-embodied technology transfer, benchmarking, technological leapfrogging, and resource leveraging form the essence of strategies for utilizing advantages. Because many companies in Asia have had to face the reality of being latecomers, the Asian perspectives are particularly useful for studying and explicating latecomer strategies.
Keywords: Latecomer Advantages and Disadvantages; Latecomer Strategy; Global Semiconductor Industry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (70)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.4.489 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:9:y:1998:i:4:p:489-505
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().