Catastrophe Avoidance Models for Hazardous Materials Route Planning

Erhan Erkut and Armann Ingolfsson
Additional contact information
Erhan Erkut: Faculty of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R6, Canada
Armann Ingolfsson: Faculty of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R6, Canada

Transportation Science, 2000, vol. 34, issue 2, 165-179

Abstract: The most-widely used definition of risk in the hazardous materials transportation literature is the expected consequence of an incident (accident resulting in a release), which, for each edge of the network, is equal to the product of the incident probability and a quantifiable consequence (such as number of people evacuated). This definition ignores the risk-averse attitudes of many decision-makers when dealing with low probability/high consequence events. We suggest that avoiding a catastrophe (an incident with a very large consequence) may be a relevant issue in routing hazardous materials, and we introduce three different catastrophe-avoidance models. In the first model, catastrophe avoidance is achieved by minimizing the maximum population exposure. In the second model, the variance of the route consequence is incorporated into the decision. In the third model, an explicit disutility function is used. We show that all three models reduce to a standard shortest path problem. Each model avoids high-population areas of the transport network. We give numerical examples and discuss the similarities and the differences among the three models. The first of the three models suggested may be the most intuitive, and is the most tractable computationally. Implementation of the other two models may be difficult due to scaling issues. Nevertheless, these models offer theoretical insight that may be valuable to researchers.

Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.34.2.165.12303 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:34:y:2000:i:2:p:165-179

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Transportation Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().