Vertical Expansion: A Solution for Future Container Terminals

Nima Zaerpour (), Amir Gharehgozli () and René De Koster ()
Additional contact information
Nima Zaerpour: College of Business Administration, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, California 92096
Amir Gharehgozli: College of Business and Economics, California State University Northridge, Northridge, California 91330
René De Koster: Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands

Transportation Science, 2019, vol. 53, issue 5, 1235–1251

Abstract: Container terminals play a major role in the growth of international trade. They need to accommodate the increasing number of containers although their space is limited, particularly close to major cities. One approach, often used in practice, is horizontal expansion through expensive land reclamation projects. In contrast, vertical expansion uses the available land more efficiently by storing containers in high-bay warehouses. In this paper, we study a next-generation container terminal consisting of container storage towers. A container tower is a cylindrical structure that consists of multiple levels of storage locations, lifts, and input/output (I/O) points (or depots). The lifts can rotate and can move containers horizontally and vertically to transport containers between the storage locations and the I/O points. We investigate several design questions: (1) What is the optimal configuration of a container tower? (2) How does a container tower compare with a traditional container block of the same storage capacity in terms of throughput capacity? (3) Is a container tower financially feasible compared with an existing container block of the same storage capacity? (4) What are the impacts of varying design parameters on the container tower performance and its financial feasibility? Question 1 is answered by obtaining closed-form expressions for the tower travel time, formulating the problem as a nonlinear optimization model, and deriving closed-form expressions for the tower optimal configuration. Questions 2 and 3 are answered by using closed-form expressions to compare the performance of two systems. Question 4 is answered by a sensitivity analysis for the design parameters of the container tower. The results show that, compared with a traditional container block, the container tower can increase the annual throughput while saving on the required footprint at competitive investment costs. In particular, the container tower can increase the annual throughput up to 120% compared with a container block of the same storage capacity.

Keywords: terminal layout; container tower; throughput; investment and operational costs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2018.0884 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:53:y:2019:i:5:p:1235-1251

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Transportation Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().