The welfare magnet hypothesis and the welfare take-up of migrants
Corrado Giulietti ()
IZA World of Labor, 2014, No 37, 37
Contrary to the welfare magnet hypothesis, empirical evidence suggests that immigration decisions are not made on the basis of the relative generosity of the receiving nation’s social benefits. Even when immigrants are found to use welfare more intensively than natives, the gap is mostly attributable to differences in social and demographic characteristics between immigrants and non-immigrants rather than to immigration status per se. Moreover, evidence in some countries suggests that immigrants exhibit less welfare dependency than natives, despite facing a higher risk of poverty.
Keywords: welfare benefits; immigration; labor mobility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H53 J61 J68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://wol.iza.org/articles/welfare-magnet-hypothe ... up-of-migrants-1.pdf (application/pdf)
http://wol.iza.org/articles/welfare-magnet-hypothe ... -take-up-of-migrants (text/html)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izawol:journl:y:2014:n:37
Access Statistics for this article
IZA World of Labor is currently edited by Daniel S. Hamermesh
More articles in IZA World of Labor from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bloomsbury Information Ltd ().