Allocation of Individuals to Job Levels under Rationing
Geert Ridder () and
Michael Visser ()
Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1994, vol. 9, issue 4, 437-51
We augment an ordered response model for the job level at which individuals desire to work with allowance for individual reporting of a discrepancy between actual and desired job level, and we also investigate possible biases from restricting the observations to the employed, and omitting the unemployed. We find that the latter bias can be ignored and interpret this as evidence that the unemployed are not choosier than the employed. People claiming inadequate capability utilization are not markedly differently allocated than those claiming a proper match. Women's lower job levels cannot be explained from rationing by capability utilization. Copyright 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0883-7252%2819941 ... 0.CO%3B2-W&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jae:japmet:v:9:y:1994:i:4:p:437-51
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www3.intersci ... e.jsp?issn=0883-7252
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Applied Econometrics is currently edited by M. Hashem Pesaran
More articles in Journal of Applied Econometrics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().