Reasoning About Other Agents: a Plea for Logic-Based Methods

Wendelin Reich ()
Additional contact information
Wendelin Reich: http://www.soc.uu.se/kontaktpers.php?id=59&lang=en

Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2004, vol. 7, issue 4, 4

Abstract: Formal logic has become an invaluable tool for research on multi-agent systems, but it plays a minor role in the more applied field of agent-based social simulation (ABSS). We argue that logical languages are particularly useful for representing social meta-reasoning, that is, agents' reasoning about the reasoning of other agents. After arguing that social meta-reasoning is a frequent and important social phenomenon, we present a set of general criteria (functional completeness, understandability, changeability, and implementability/executability) to compare logic to two alternative formal methods: black box techniques (e.g., neural networks) and decision-theoretical models (e.g., game theory). We then argue that in terms of functional completeness, understandability and changeability, logical representations of social meta-reasoning compare favorably to these two alternatives.

Keywords: Formal Logic; Social Interaction; Social Simulation; Agents; Social Meta-Reasoning; Reasoning About Reasoning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-10-31
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/4/4.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jas:jasssj:2003-59-2

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation from Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesco Renzini ().