Identifying Salient Drivers of Livelihood Decision-Making in the Forest Communities of Cameroon: Adding Value to Social Simulation Models

Sukaina Bharwani (), Mònica Coll Besa (), Richard Taylor (), Michael Fischer (), Tahia Devisscher () and Chrislain Kenfack ()
Additional contact information
Sukaina Bharwani: http://sei-international.org/staff?staffid=104
Mònica Coll Besa: http://www.sei-international.org/staff?staffid=331
Richard Taylor: http://www.sei-international.org/staff?staffid=140
Michael Fischer: http://www.kent.ac.uk/sac/staff-profiles/profiles/social-anthropology/academic-staff/fischer_michael.html
Tahia Devisscher: http://www.sei-international.org/staff?staffid=208
Chrislain Kenfack: http://www.ces.uc.pt/doutoramentos/util/info.php?id_lingua=2&id_doutoramento=5&id_investigador=849

Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2015, vol. 18, issue 1, 3

Abstract: This paper describes a participatory and collaborative process for formalising qualitative data, using research from southeast Cameroon, how these results can provide input to an social simulation model, and what insights they can provide in better understanding decision-making in the region. Knowledge Elicitation Tools (KnETs) have been used to support a body of existing research on local strategies that build community adaptive capacity and support sustainable forest management under a range of socio-environmental and climatic stressors. The output of this approach is a set of decision rules which complements previous analysis of differentiated vulnerability of forest communities. Improvements to the KnETs methodology, such as new statistical measurements, make it easier to generate inputs for a social simulation model, such as agent attributes and heterogeneity, as well as informing which scenarios to prioritise during model development and testing. The KnETs process served as a vehicle to structure a large volume of empirical data, to identify the most salient drivers of decision-making amongst different actors, to uncover tacit knowledge and to make recommendations about which strategic interventions should be further explored in a social simulation and by local organizations planning interventions. It was notable that there were many common rule drivers for men and women from the same households, though they participated in the game-interviews separately. At the same time, though strategies were common to both poor and better-off farmers, differences lay in the package of strategies chosen – the number and type of strategies as well the drivers factors – and how they were prioritised with respect to each farmer’s goal.

Keywords: Knowledge Elicitation; Decision-Making; Climate Adaptation; Verification and Validation; Social Simulation; Tacit Knowledge (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-01-31
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.jasss.org/18/1/3/3.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jas:jasssj:2013-143-2

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation from Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesco Renzini ().