Evaluating the Performance of Iterative Proportional Fitting for Spatial Microsimulation: New Tests for an Established Technique

Robin Lovelace (), Mark Birkin (), Dimitris Ballas () and Eveline van Leeuwen ()
Additional contact information
Robin Lovelace: http://robinlovelace.net/
Mark Birkin: http://www.geog.leeds.ac.uk/people/m.birkin
Dimitris Ballas: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/geography/staff/ballas_dimitris
Eveline van Leeuwen: http://www.feweb.vu.nl/nl/afdelingen-en-instituten/spatial-economics/staff/e-leeuwen/

Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2015, vol. 18, issue 2, 21

Abstract: Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF), also known as biproportional fitting, ‘raking’ or the RAS algorithm, is an established procedure used in a variety of applications across the social sciences. Primary amongst these for urban modelling has been its use in static spatial microsimulation to generate small area microdata — individual level data allocated to administrative zones. The technique is mature, widely used and relatively straight-forward. Although IPF is well described mathematically, accessible examples of the algorithm written in modern programming languages are rare. There is a tendency for researchers to ‘start from scratch’, resulting in a variety of ad hoc implementations and little evidence about the relative merits of differing approaches. These knowledge gaps mean that answers to certain methodological questions must be guessed: How can ‘empty cells’ be identified and how do they influence model fit? Can IPF be made more computationally efficient? This paper tackles these questions and more using a systematic methodology with publicly available code and data. The results demonstrate the sensitivity of the results to initial conditions, notably the presence of ‘empty cells’, and the dramatic impact of software decisions on computational efficiency. The paper concludes by proposing an agenda for robust and transparent future tests in the field.

Keywords: Microsimulation; Iterative Proportional Fitting; Deterministic Reweighting; Population Synthesis; Model Testing; Validation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-03-31
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.jasss.org/18/2/21/21.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jas:jasssj:2014-122-3

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation from Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesco Renzini ().