An Argument Communication Model of Polarization and Ideological Alignment
Sven Banisch () and
Eckehard Olbrich ()
Additional contact information
Eckehard Olbrich: http://www.mis.mpg.de/de/jjost/members/eckehard-olbrich.html
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2021, vol. 24, issue 1, 1
This multi-level model of opinion formation considers that attitudes on diï¬€erent issues are usually not independent. In the model, agents exchange beliefs regarding a series of facts. A cognitive structure of evaluative associations links diï¬€erent (partially overlapping) sets of facts on diï¬€erent political issues and determines agentsâ€™ attitudinal positions in a way borrowed from expectancy value theory. If agents preferentially interact with other agents who hold similar attitudes on one or several issues, this leads to biased argument pools and increasing polarization in the sense that groups of agents selectively believe in distinct subsets of facts. Besides the emergence of a bi-modal distribution of opinions on single issues as most previous opinion polarization models address, our model also accounts for the alignment of attitudes across several issues along ideological dimensions.
Keywords: Argument Communication Theory; Opinion Dynamics; Polarisation; Ideological Alignment; Belief Systems; Cognitive-Evaluative Maps (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jas:jasssj:2020-27-3
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation from Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Flaminio Squazzoni ().