EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A classification of structural inertia: Variations in structural response

Gavin M. Schwarz (), Kuo-Pin Yang (), Christine Chou () and Yu-Jen Chiu ()
Additional contact information
Gavin M. Schwarz: University of New South Wales, UNSW
Kuo-Pin Yang: National Dong Hwa University
Christine Chou: National Dong Hwa University
Yu-Jen Chiu: Oriental Institute of Technology

Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2020, vol. 37, issue 1, 33-63

Abstract: Abstract Structurally inert firms suffer elevated failure risks in the face of environmental change because inertia makes it difficult to keep pace with the speed of such change. Traditionally, this ecology theory based outlook focuses on the risks of mortality, treating the make-up of an organization’s architecture as uniform and thus relatively inconsequential for understanding this hazard. Renewing recent debates on inertia and on structure, in this paper we examine the specifics of the make-up of structural inertia in the context of failure hazards—the measurable survival risks associated with failure. Developing a classification of structural inertia, we test a sample of 755 firms listed on the Taiwanese Security Exchange across 52 industries to develop a convention on organizational structure, ratifying that structural inertia differs by type in incorporating failure hazards. Findings differentiate between and elaborate the validating environmental and resource conditions for these different categories, detailing the extent to which failure hazards are related to the specifics of each type. This variation is helpful in explaining better why, despite conditions leading to failure, inert organizations continue to thrive over time. Discussing this logic addresses the narrow representation of structural inertia and limitations to its theoretical development over several decades. It also shows that traditional organizational ecology measures can be legitimately underplayed in organizations dealing with increased failure hazards in favor of the characteristics of different structural inertia types.

Keywords: Structural inertia; Organizational failure; Organizational structures; Organizational environments; Organizational ecology; Asia; Taiwan (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10490-018-9588-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:37:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10490-018-9588-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... 29/journal/10490/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10490-018-9588-6

Access Statistics for this article

Asia Pacific Journal of Management is currently edited by Jane Lu

More articles in Asia Pacific Journal of Management from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

 
Page updated 2020-04-25
Handle: RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:37:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10490-018-9588-6