Proactive government intervention, board gender balance, and stakeholder engagement in China and Europe
Paul B. McGuinness (),
João Paulo Vieito () and
Mingzhu Wang ()
Additional contact information
Paul B. McGuinness: The Chinese University of Hong Kong
João Paulo Vieito: Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo
Mingzhu Wang: King’s College London
Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2020, vol. 37, issue 3, No 5, 719-762
Abstract:
Abstract This study assesses the management quality and corporate social performance of firms supervised according to three distinctly different governance regimes. The differences relate to protocols and interventions on board gender balance. Sweden and Norway serve as our strongly gender-inclusive (SGI) benchmarks, with the UK and China as our respective moderately (MGI) and weakly gender-inclusive (WGI) domains. Our evidence shows that corporate social performance ratings have risen appreciably between 2010 and 2015 in each of China, the UK, Sweden and Norway. Moreover, corporate social responsibility (CSR) ratings in Sweden, Norway and the UK appear broadly comparable. In extending Ahern and Dittmar’s (Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 137–197, 2012) evidence of a quota’s initial deleterious effect on managerial quality, we observe improvement in Norwegian firms’ directors’ educational profiles as quotas become more entrenched. Average director age (experience) also rose in such firms over the study period. Our results suggest some degree of adaptation in the application of board quotas. Additionally, variation in female board participation exerts minimal (strong) influence on CSR ratings for SGI- (MGI- & WGI-) domain entities. Findings on this issue for China and the UK strongly support a critical mass theory (CMT; Konrad, Kramer, & Erkut, Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164, 2008) conception of corporate social-engagement. Finally, results reveal a non-uniform relation between corporate social and financial returns. Overall, we add new context to institutional theory narratives on stakeholder-engagement (Campbell, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967, 2007; Young & Makhija, Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 670–698, 2014).
Keywords: Gender quotas; Corporate boards; Management quality; Social performance; Norway; Sweden; China; The United Kingdom (UK) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10490-018-9611-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:37:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10490-018-9611-y
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... 29/journal/10490/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-018-9611-y
Access Statistics for this article
Asia Pacific Journal of Management is currently edited by Jane Lu
More articles in Asia Pacific Journal of Management from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().