Coping with Commodification: Hybrid strategies in Asian law firms
Dawn Y. Chow () and
Lai Si Tsui-Auch
Additional contact information
Dawn Y. Chow: Singapore University of Social Sciences
Lai Si Tsui-Auch: Nanyang Technological University
Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2020, vol. 37, issue 3, No 6, 763-793
Abstract:
Abstract Research has indicated that many organizations are located at complex boundary zones which are guided by differing institutional logics. As varied institutional logics overlap, there may be strains on organizations which are trapped within shared boundaries. To reduce such strains and to respond to institutional logic clash, organizations within different fields tend to resort to hybrid strategies of action. However, despite the plethora of studies, there is still a lack of a coherent body of research that addresses the question of how and why organizations experience institutional complexity differently. In response to calls for research on how particular organizational attributes of firms would matter to the experience of firms in situ, we examine how a particular organizational attribute – organizational size— matters, by conducting comparative research on a large versus small Singapore law firm. We thus contribute to the research by showing how hybrid strategies enable organizations to resolve institutional logic clash. Also, we reveal the structural condition underlying the firms’ hybrid strategies in response to commodification pressures. Contrary to extant research that suggests otherwise, our findings demonstrate that small, rather than large firms, are in fact better suited to adapt to institutional change, so long as they can carve out a particular niche market for themselves. Additionally, unlike extant research in international business that may have hypothesized a rather large impact of MNCs on a country’s competitive landscape, we find that there are limits to the influence that an MNC has, especially on smaller local players.
Keywords: Institutional change; Organizational response; Social trustee logic; Client-service logic; Professions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10490-018-9629-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:37:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10490-018-9629-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... 29/journal/10490/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-018-9629-1
Access Statistics for this article
Asia Pacific Journal of Management is currently edited by Jane Lu
More articles in Asia Pacific Journal of Management from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().