The Role of Stocks and Shocks Concepts in the Debate Over Price Versus Quantity
John Parsons () and
Luca Taschini
Environmental & Resource Economics, 2013, vol. 55, issue 1, 86 pages
Abstract:
Recent literature showed that the choice between a price or quantity control depends, in part, on the dynamic structure of cost uncertainty. Temporary shocks to abatement cost favors the use of a price control, while permanent shocks favor a quantity control. Unfortunately, the importance of this assumption to the optimal choice has not yet received wide attention among economists. We analyze the regulatory sproblem in an alternative setting and reproduce these results. Our contribution is the simplicity of the model and the accessibility of the results, which reinforce the critical role played by the assumed structure of uncertainty. Copyright The Author(s) 2013
Keywords: Cap and trade; Permanent shocks; Tax; Transitory shocks; H23; Q28; Q50; Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10640-012-9614-y (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:enreec:v:55:y:2013:i:1:p:71-86
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10640/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-012-9614-y
Access Statistics for this article
Environmental & Resource Economics is currently edited by Ian J. Bateman
More articles in Environmental & Resource Economics from Springer, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().