Testing the Influence of Substitute Sites in Nature Valuation by Using Spatial Discounting Factors
Jeremy Valck (),
Joris Aertsens and
Liesbet Vranken ()
Additional contact information
Jeremy Valck: KU Leuven
Steven Broekx: Flemish Institute for Technological Research VITO
Inge Liekens: Flemish Institute for Technological Research VITO
Joris Aertsens: Flemish Institute for Technological Research VITO
Environmental & Resource Economics, 2017, vol. 66, issue 1, 17-43
Abstract This paper investigates the effect of nearby nature substitute sites on preferences for nature restoration. Contrary to prior studies, we use a respondent-centric approach to control for substitute sites. We assess each respondent-specific spatial context by computing densities of nature substitute sites within various ranges from each respondent’s home. This approach considers the use and non-use values of nature together. Data from three similar discrete choice experiments carried out in Flanders (Belgium) are compared. Different spatial discounting factors are tested to explore how the substitution effect behaves with regard to distance. Latent class analyses are performed to account for preference heterogeneity among respondents. We observe divergent behaviours across groups of respondents. The “distance-to-substitutes” affects how respondents gauge substitute sites. We find a significant influence of the squared average buffer distance but this effect varies in sign across case studies and classes of respondents. Our results demonstrate that individual-specific GIS data can significantly improve the representation of the spatial context and the transferability of value functions. However, the roles played by preference heterogeneity and nature perception on respondents’ capacity to value nature still deserves further attention in future research.
Keywords: Benefit transfer; Discrete choice experiment; Ecosystem services; GIS; Latent class; Nature; Non-market valuation; Spatial; Substitute (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q20 Q26 Q51 Q57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-015-9930-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:enreec:v:66:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-015-9930-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10640/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Environmental & Resource Economics is currently edited by Ian J. Bateman
More articles in Environmental & Resource Economics from Springer, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().