Economics at your fingertips  

Using Individualised Choice Maps to Capture the Spatial Dimensions of Value Within Choice Experiments

Tomas Badura (), Silvia Ferrini, Michael Burton, Amy Binner and Ian Bateman ()
Additional contact information
Tomas Badura: University of East Anglia
Silvia Ferrini: University of East Anglia
Michael Burton: The University of Western Australia (M089)
Amy Binner: University of Exeter Business School

Environmental & Resource Economics, 2020, vol. 75, issue 2, No 4, 297-322

Abstract: Abstract Understanding how the value of environmental goods and services is influenced by their location relative to where people live can help identify the economically optimal spatial distribution of conservation interventions across landscapes. However, capturing these spatial relationships within the confines of a stated preference study has proved challenging. We propose and implement a novel approach to incorporating space within the design and presentation of stated preference choice experiments (CE). Using an investigation of preferences concerning land use change in Great Britain, CE scenarios are presented through individually generated maps, tailored to each respondent’s home location. Each choice situation is generated in real time and is underpinned by spatially tailored experimental designs that reflect current British land uses and incorporate locational attributes relating to physical and administrative dimensions of space. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first CE study to integrate space into both the survey design and presentation of choice tasks in this way. Presented methodology provides means for testing how presentation of spatial information influence stated preferences. We contrast our spatially explicit (mapped) approach with a commonly applied tabular CE approach finding that the former exhibits a number of desirable characteristics relative to the latter.

Keywords: Choice experiment; Distance decay; Economic valuation; Maps; Spatial and temporal issues; Spatial heterogeneity; Stated preferences; Survey design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10640/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10640-019-00358-3

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental & Resource Economics is currently edited by Ian J. Bateman

More articles in Environmental & Resource Economics from Springer, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

Page updated 2020-04-23
Handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:75:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00358-3