Inferring Economic Impacts from a Program’s Physical Outcomes: An Application to Forest Protection in Thailand

Wumeng He, Orapan Nabangchang, Krista Erdman, Alex C. A. Vanko, Prapti Poudel, Chandra Giri and Jeffrey R. Vincent ()
Additional contact information
Wumeng He: Wuhan University
Orapan Nabangchang: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University
Krista Erdman: South Dakota Department of Agriculture
Alex C. A. Vanko: Wildlands Network
Prapti Poudel: College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University
Chandra Giri: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Jeffrey R. Vincent: Duke University

Environmental & Resource Economics, 2023, vol. 84, issue 3, No 9, 845-876

Abstract: Abstract Economists typically estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) when evaluating government programs. The economic interpretation of the ATT can be ambiguous when program outcomes are measured in purely physical terms, as they often are in evaluations of environmental programs (e.g., avoided deforestation). This paper presents an approach for inferring economic impacts from physical outcomes when the ATT is estimated using propensity-score matching. For the case of forest protection, we show that a protection program’s ex post economic impact, as perceived by the government agency responsible for protection decisions, can be proxied by a weighted ATT, with the weights derived from the propensity of being treated (i.e., protected). We apply this new metric to mangrove protection in Thailand during 1987–2000. We find that the government’s protection program avoided the loss of 12.8% of the economic value associated with the protected mangrove area. This estimate is about a quarter smaller than the conventional ATT for avoided deforestation, 17.3 percentage points. The difference between the two measures indicates that the program tended to be less effective at reducing deforestation in locations where the government perceived the net benefits of protection as being greater, which is the opposite of the relationship that would characterize a maximally effective program.

Keywords: Forest; Impact evaluation; Mangrove; Propensity score matching; Protected area; Random utility model; Roy model; Thailand; Treatment effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-021-00644-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:enreec:v:84:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-021-00644-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10640/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10640-021-00644-z

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental & Resource Economics is currently edited by Ian J. Bateman

More articles in Environmental & Resource Economics from Springer, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().