Optimal Point Source Abatement Technology Adoption: The Impact of Uncertainty in the Benefits of Abatement
Andrew L. Goodkind (),
Jay S. Coggins (),
Christopher W. Tessum () and
Julian D. Marshall ()
Additional contact information
Andrew L. Goodkind: University of New Mexico
Jay S. Coggins: University of Minnesota
Christopher W. Tessum: University of Illinois
Julian D. Marshall: University of Washington
Environmental & Resource Economics, 2025, vol. 88, issue 3, No 6, 709-730
Abstract:
Abstract Reducing emissions from point sources may be justified by the large expected benefits of improved health. However, the optimal reduction in emissions is complicated by the large uncertainty regarding the magnitude of these benefits. In particular, there is uncertainty in the size of the impact of pollution on increased premature mortality, and in the monetary valuation of reducing risks of mortality. We calculate the optimal emission reductions from abatement technology adoption at most point sources of SO2, NOX, and primary PM2.5 in the United States across a wide range of uncertainty in the parameters used to estimate benefits of reductions. The results demonstrate that although the range of uncertainty in benefits is very wide, as long as the benefits are not at the low end of the distribution, the optimal abatement from sources is in a relatively narrow range. It is when benefits of reducing pollution are well below their mean estimates that the optimal reduction in emissions varies substantially. Resolving the likelihood of very low benefits of abatement could potentially reduce the uncertainty regarding optimal abatement policy.
Keywords: Air pollution; Value of a statistical life; Concentration-response; Uncertainty; Environmental economics; Abatement costs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-024-00946-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:enreec:v:88:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-024-00946-y
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10640/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00946-y
Access Statistics for this article
Environmental & Resource Economics is currently edited by Ian J. Bateman
More articles in Environmental & Resource Economics from Springer, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().