Environmental Policy Instruments for Investments in Backstop Technologies Under Present Bias - An Application to the Building Sector

Fabian Arnold, Amir Ashour Novirdoust and Philipp Theile ()
Additional contact information
Fabian Arnold: Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne
Amir Ashour Novirdoust: Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne
Philipp Theile: Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne

Environmental & Resource Economics, 2025, vol. 88, issue 4, No 6, 1039-1070

Abstract: Abstract Governments worldwide have set targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the residential sector to zero or close to zero. Policy instruments, such as carbon pricing or subsidies, are being discussed and implemented to achieve these targets. If individuals exhibit present bias, Heutel (2015) has shown that optimal policies targeting investments in externality-producing durable goods consist of two components, one aimed at the externality and one aimed at the present bias. We generalize Heutel’s theoretical model by defining a larger technology set. This allows us to represent the dependence of fuel prices and emission intensities on technologies used to include a zero-emission backstop technology. We examine the implications of this model generalization, and we numerically assess the effect in a stylized case study for a representative building in Germany. We show that as long as social costs of carbon and the corresponding $${\hbox {CO}}_{2}$$ price are not high enough to make the backstop technology optimal, Heutel’s proposition holds that optimal policies must consist of two components. Generalizing Heutel’s proposition, a single instrument can address present bias, if the social costs of carbon and the $${\hbox {CO}}_{2}$$ price are high enough. While the level of this single instrument, i.e., a tax or subsidy, depends on the level of present bias, we find that there exists a tax-subsidy combination that is optimal regardless of the level of present bias.

Keywords: Present bias; Policy; Heating investments; Durable goods; Climate neutrality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D15 D62 D91 H23 Q48 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-025-00960-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:enreec:v:88:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-025-00960-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10640/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10640-025-00960-8

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental & Resource Economics is currently edited by Ian J. Bateman

More articles in Environmental & Resource Economics from Springer, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().