Ben Franklin’s Whistle, Cost Expectations, and the Choice of Valuation Format

Michael Hanemann (), Jon Krosnick (), Lisanne Wichgers (), Jeffrey Wooldridge (), Stephanie Lampron (), Daniel Schneider (), Eric M. Shaeffer (), Trevor Tompson () and Penny Visser ()
Additional contact information
Michael Hanemann: University of California
Jon Krosnick: Stanford University
Lisanne Wichgers: BNR News Radio
Jeffrey Wooldridge: Michigan State University
Stephanie Lampron: George Mason University
Daniel Schneider: Schneider & Ortmanns
Eric M. Shaeffer: The Strategy Team
Trevor Tompson: NORC at the University of Chicago
Penny Visser: University of Chicago

Environmental & Resource Economics, 2025, vol. 88, issue 5, No 7, 1375-1406

Abstract: Abstract Contingent valuation surveys have used a variety of formats for the valuation question, including open-ended (OE) and single-bounded closed-ended (CE) elicitation. The OE format assesses maximum WTP directly, whereas the CE format assesses it indirectly. When the two formats have been compared, responses have often been different: the CE format often generated a larger estimate of WTP than the OE format. That finding has spawned a large literature in economics and marketing. We propose an explanation for the difference in OE and CE responses rooted in the psychology of questionnaire design, which focuses on a phenomenon pointed out long ago by Benjamin Franklin for a private good that could also apply to a public good. The hypothesis is that respondents are averse to paying more for something than they think it should cost them. To test this hypothesis, an experiment embedded in a representative sample survey measured respondents’ perceptions of the cost of providing a public good, as well as their valuations using an OE or CE valuation format. Findings are consistent with Ben Franklin-like aversion to overpaying in the OE format, which leads OE responses to understate true willingness to pay. The CE format yielded more valid measurements of economic value. This paper introduces a new non-parametric approach to the estimation of WTP as a function of covariates using CE data.

Keywords: Contingent Valuation; Question Format; Cognitive Survey Design; Response Substitution; Anchoring; Lewbel-Watanabe Estimator; ABERS Estimator (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-025-00969-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:enreec:v:88:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10640-025-00969-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10640/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10640-025-00969-z

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental & Resource Economics is currently edited by Ian J. Bateman

More articles in Environmental & Resource Economics from Springer, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().