Nice to you, nicer to me: Does self-serving generosity diminish the reciprocal response?
Daniel Woods () and
Maroš Servátka
Additional contact information
Daniel Woods: Purdue University, Krannert School of Management
Experimental Economics, 2019, vol. 22, issue 2, No 10, 506-529
Abstract:
Abstract Reciprocity has been shown to be sensitive to perceived intentions, however, not much is known about the intensity of reciprocal responses to the precise nature of those intentions. For example, a person can strategically appear to be kind while being self-serving or can be selflessly (genuinely) kind. Do these two intentions elicit different reciprocal reactions? We propose a conjecture that self-serving but generous actions diminish the positively reciprocal response, compared to selfless generous actions. We classify actions that increase a recipient’s maximum payoff, but by less than the giver’s maximum payoff, as being self-serving generous actions, while classifying actions that increase a recipient’s maximum payoff by more than the giver’s as selfless generous actions. We hypothesize that selfless generous actions are considered more generous than self-serving generous actions, and that self-serving generous actions will therefore result in a diminished reciprocal response. We test this conjecture using two novel experimental designs. We find some evidence that subjects perceive self-serving generous actions as being less generous than selfless generous actions, but no empirical support for our conjecture on the diminished reciprocal response.
Keywords: Reciprocity; Generosity; Self-Serving; Genuine; Experiment; Lost wallet game; Investment game (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 C91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10683-018-9561-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
Working Paper: Nice to You, Nicer to Me: Does Self-Serving Generosity Diminish the Reciprocal Response? (2017) 
Working Paper: Nice to You, Nicer to Me: Does Self-Serving Generosity Diminish the Reciprocal Response? (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:expeco:v:22:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10683-018-9561-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/10683/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-018-9561-8
Access Statistics for this article
Experimental Economics is currently edited by David J. Cooper, Lata Gangadharan and Charles N. Noussair
More articles in Experimental Economics from Springer, Economic Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().