EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: lab, field and online evidence

Pablo Brañas-Garza, Diego Jorrat, Antonio Espín and Angel Sánchez
Additional contact information
Angel Sánchez: GISC & IBiDat, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

Experimental Economics, 2023, vol. 26, issue 2, No 8, 412-434

Abstract: Abstract The use of real decision-making incentives remains under debate after decades of economic experiments. In time preferences experiments involving future payments, real incentives are particularly problematic due to between-options differences in transaction costs, among other issues. What if hypothetical payments provide accurate data which, moreover, avoid transaction cost problems? In this paper, we test whether the use of hypothetical or one-out-of-ten-participants probabilistic—versus real—payments affects the elicitation of short-term and long-term discounting in a standard multiple price list task. We analyze data from a lab experiment in Spain and well-powered field and online experiments in Nigeria and the UK, respectively (N = 2,038). Our results indicate that the preferences elicited using the three payment methods are mostly the same: we can reject that either hypothetical or one-out-of-ten payments change any of the four preference measures considered by more than 0.18 SD with respect to real payments.

Keywords: Time preferences; Hypothetical vs. real payoffs; Lab; Field; Online experiments; BRIS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 C93 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10683-022-09776-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
Working Paper: Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: Lab, field and online evidence (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: Lab, field and online evidence (2020) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:expeco:v:26:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10683-022-09776-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/10683/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10683-022-09776-5

Access Statistics for this article

Experimental Economics is currently edited by David J. Cooper, Lata Gangadharan and Charles N. Noussair

More articles in Experimental Economics from Springer, Economic Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla (sonal.shukla@springer.com) and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (indexing@springernature.com).

 
Page updated 2024-12-28
Handle: RePEc:kap:expeco:v:26:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10683-022-09776-5