EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Controversial Advert Perceptions in SNS Advertising: The Role of Ethical Judgement and Religious Commitment

Selma Kadić-Maglajlić (), Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić (), Milena Micevski (), Nina Michaelidou () and Ekaterina Nemkova ()
Additional contact information
Selma Kadić-Maglajlić: University of Sarajevo
Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić: University of Sarajevo
Milena Micevski: Loughborough University
Nina Michaelidou: Loughborough University
Ekaterina Nemkova: Nottingham University Business School

Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, vol. 141, issue 2, No 3, 249-265

Abstract: Abstract This study attempts to advance knowledge in the area of controversial advertising by examining the antecedents and consequences of controversial advert perceptions in the context of social media, and particularly social networking sites (SNS). Specifically, we explore how ethical judgement and religious commitment shape controversial advert perceptions leading to attitudes towards the advert, brand attitudes and purchase intentions. Our results indicate that when a SNS advert is judged to be ethically acceptable, the level of perceived advert controversy is lower. However, the impact of ethical judgement on controversial advert perceptions becomes significant and positive when intrapersonal commitment and interpersonal religious commitment are introduced as moderators. This result implies that the level of religious commitment changes the ethical judgement–controversial advert perceptions relationship. The results also highlight that controversial advert perceptions negatively influence attitude towards the advert. The study contributes to the limited knowledge on controversial advertising on SNS, yielding significant and relevant implications for academics and advertisers alike, in their effort to improve advertising effectiveness without offending or alienating target audiences.

Keywords: Controversial advert perceptions; Ethical judgement; Religious commitment; Social networking sites (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-015-2755-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:141:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-015-2755-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10551/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2755-5

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Ethics is currently edited by Michelle Greenwood and R. Edward Freeman

More articles in Journal of Business Ethics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:141:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-015-2755-5